Sociology

The point of view - in a dialogue with Francis Fukuyama

 "America will not abandon the policy of double standards, and will not undermine the security and stability of authoritarian regimes allied with the Arab world to support democracy in the region"

Interview India Arob
Explaining the reasons for backing away from supporting the U.S. invasion of Iraq after the first preachers to use the logic of power, Francis Fukuyama thinker controversial and with ideas Almistoagafh, who now live stage review of many of his ideas, awash with explicitly in this dialogue which recognizes the adoption of democracy as a pretext for the war on Iraq, which lacked any long-term strategy. And will not stand his candor when these limits, but will recognize the fear of Republicans from the membership of the International Criminal Court, and the need for trial, even intellectuals who pushed Pflm kiss the war, and not to give up America, part of its new for the Third Millennium, their interests Almstdeih to the policy of double standards. Also in this dialogue, we discuss again the idea of Fukuyama's The End of History and democratic institutions of the exporting countries, tertiary, and the end of American global dominance and direction of the latter towards multipolarity, then the confrontation between the Western world to Islam and the political version of the radical. And dialogue will not end without Francis Fukuyama reveal to readers the content of his forthcoming book, "The Roots of the political system."

• In 2003 changed your attitude about the idea of using the mechanism of force to strengthen and consolidate democracy, and in 2006 published an article criticizing the policy of neo-conservatives and their attitudes and actions, what are the reasons the real Hmaalthol note that you are classified as one of the neo-conservative intellectuals, and one of the advocates of the use of force against terrorism and get rid of the system Saddam?

Francis Fukuyama: There was this shift in my attitude years Badahjmat atheist Ashrmn September, and the year before the invasion of Iraq, the year 2002, when the Bush administration was preparing to invade Iraq, and I was then in a European tour to discuss issues related to American policy, the first issue of the invasion with Kbaralchksaat Europe. During the these discussions, in the midst of watching the steps invasion closely, reveal to me that the Bush administration did not attend well to this invasion, specifically for the post-invasion and reasons stated such as democracy unrelated to the fact that the invasion and its objectives, especially as I spent years Avkroabges of the U.S. invasion as a case Vietnam, and every time I conclude the same conclusion, that the U.S. invasion does not care and Yders post Baadaghazo, and Alomrmath happened in the case of Iraq, as he was as born before the invasion I found out that the Bush administration does not have any plan seriously for Baadaharb in Iraq. It was an adventure is calculated on American foreign policy. they look at Bush's invasion and its consequences imagined over optimistic, especially in the reliance on the ease of transition Nhawwaldemqratih, it became clear that they do not understand the complexities of the situation and its historical, cultural and geo-strategic, as it is not easy to create democratic institutions, the state of developing Weserah lightning, they were not aware of Bmhaazir different environmental and cultural, to adopt - they themselves - later, that Alomrlm not space spring. So lack of adequate preparation for the invasion, lack of planning, what after it, made ​​me certain that the losses and errors would be huge and terrible, so changed my position no longer an advocate of the invasion.

• Olatad the leadership of the war as "democracy" and Ddalansanah a crime against democracy itself? Is it possible to build democracy through invasion, destruction and torture?

Francis Fukuyama: Of course not; democracy were not the main objective of this war, it's an excuse promoted and believed by many, was the first concern of this war, a security assembly, the obsession second Vtgly in ending Saddam's regime as part of a series of war on terrorism, and before that has this system actually weapons of mass destruction, democracy was the only justification.

• Did not Alomdama against humanity?

Francis Fukuyama: initially can use force to protect human rights, prevention of Khtirhejom what is not wrong. But I think that the force must be used Bhzrushdid, and subject to international laws, standards and controls, the objective is the protection of the international system and to respect its laws.

• Province: but to imagine the concept of use of force "preventive", not a guarantee abuses and violations and heinous crimes committed in the name of self-defense, how is classified as "Abu Ghraib" and committed the U.S. military in Iraq under the pretext of "preventing" a potential threat.

Francis Fukuyama: I will give an example of the use of force for the purposes of good, like that of Sierra Leone in 1999, where British intervention under the UN umbrella, not for democracy, but for security, a model for the use of force.

• Comment: I think that there is a link between the case of Sierra Leone and Halhalarac, this without discussion that what is happening in sub-Saharan countries of Africa, from the disturbances, wars, famines, stands behind the major powers in collusion with local regulations, to hide later in pregnancy dress Mtoaan UN umbrella ...

Francis Fukuyama) intervening (: But I, however, say that it is possible to use a force for democracy, stressing at the same now that it should not turn into a usually routine or easy; because we can not guarantee how the use of force, Vctt and violations set out, as happened in Iraq .

• Based upon, do you get rid of Saddam's regime would have required 13 years of blockade and economic sanctions, and then finished off by the invasion of Iraq, its structure and the destruction of infrastructure, and the killing of people, young and old? Do not you think that if the U.S. got rid of Saddam Alomrakihaltdh the way you got rid of Salvador Allende of the system, it would lower the cost of war and equipment, or that the price was worth it, as Madeleine Albright said?

Francis Fukuyama: No, never, not eligible for this price, to get rid of Saddam's regime was not required to make the Iraqi people Etjra all this suffering. Msúlhan America and the suffering of the Iraqi people and the nation, it has been a terrible mistake.

• Intrusive: just a terrible mistake! Is not it a crime?

Francis Fukuyama:) laughs (Indeed, there is no standard to determine the merits Sourhjerima and, therefore, say that a terrible mistake caused by a terrible policy, rather than a crime.

• Comment: How is that? There is no standard? There are international laws, especially those relating to the wars of the Geneva Conventions and the rest of the chapters of international humanitarian law, and the Kbaralalme, intellectuals and men of international law and even some American military, they stressed it was a crime by all standards and criteria, Anhajeryma war and a crime against humanity ...

Francis Fukuyama: just say that it was a terrible mistake.

• Well, I attended together with Professor Ereli Diamond, a report on what mends his ways and crooked in the experiences of Iraq and Afghanistan, under the title What went wrong and right in Iraq and Afghanistan do you assess which experiences, and Tstron fatal errors in both, what was the fatal errors in each of the Iraq and Afghanistan?

Francis Fukuyama: they are two different: in Alhalhalavganah, no U.S. invasion supporting internationalist, and the fatal mistake is in the initiative early to rebuild the State of Afghanistan, according to Almaiaralgrbeh, making America incur huge costs and enormous were not unsustainable, has been a long time and found troops and Management Americas themselves in the case of drain. Omaalhalh Iraq, they are unlike Afghanistan, where the invasion itself Aattabrkhto murderer though he was supported by the internationalist, in addition to lack of planning for the post-war, and not expect a civil war and the terrible things that have occurred as Abu Ghraib.

• Alcalá these reasons, America fears the membership of the International Criminal Court? Can the Obama administration is pushing for membership, after flatly rejected by the Bush administration?

Francis Fukuyama: The problem lies in the inability to ratify any international treaty without the approval of two thirds of the Senate, and Obama alone will not be able to pass a resolution to approve the membership of the International Criminal Court because of Republican control in the direction of Compacters rejection.

• Outstanding: So they are afraid of the membership, and the possibility of trying members of the management of hawks by the International Criminal Court.

Francis Fukuyama) contemplates and then answer (: Yes, Alomrkzlk, they are afraid.

• This is evidence that blood on their hands, and that what they have done a crime and not just a terrible mistake. In the same context of the trial and accounting, do not you think he should be prosecuted intellectuals and researchers who pushed in the direction of the war, they were involved in the crime Pflm?

Francis Fukuyama: I think that anyone involved in such heinous acts should be held accountable, even intellectuals. But how should be held accountable?. It is in fact a complex question, the war is the decision to a decision Politically, they are involved and the first Bush administration and the military who have achieved this war, the intellectuals, there is nothing in the law refers to them.

• Reviewer: at least, to be levied morally accountable.

Francis Fukuyama: Yes, I believe strongly in accountability and intellectuals involved in the war, but certainly should not be held accountable are held accountable for how the military.

• Is it possible that the Obama administration is leading a war against Iran or Syria?

Francis Fukuyama: No, I do not think that the Obama administration will lead the war against Iran or Syria. The war is not a priority of the current U.S. administration, but that America today has become unable to lead any new war in the Middle East, the war has become a scenario feared by everyone in America. And America will not support - I believe - any step may provide unilateral war by Israel against Hizbullah, for example.

• In this case, seriously believes that America will support Israel if it took a single step by the war?

Francis Fukuyama: Yes, I firmly believe that America is not going to push Israel to take any step of war, and will not support them in case the decision was an Israeli purely, if it comes to the Bush administration to push in the direction of the war. Real and it is now, no one wants to pay towards the war.

• Do not you think that the confrontation between radical Islam and the Arab world led by America, has opened a new era of history and not the end as you expected? Then you not see that the Western model of democracy, specifically the concept of Thariralsouk open a history of slavery and domination, poverty and dependency, as the depth of the gap between the global south and north, and thus idea of the end history and the world to adopt a single model) western democracy (is against human nature and dynamics of communities Alepeshriaaly local and international levels?

Francis Fukuyama: I do not think so, because even in the Islamic world, radical Islam Garmreh it, and the Islamists generally have the concept of theocracy very authority and the State as a model of the Taliban and Salafi movements. In the Arab world there is no strong support for these currents, and I doubt that link these movements to power, the Living under the Islamic Republic will not find great acceptance. but I recognized that the Islamic model - political, remains at the global level, an alternative to the alternatives on the scene Kalmaarkisih for example, and is certain that different alternative in terms of its contents, principles and concepts, different even in the struggle, Vasraa America and Islam radical variant of the conflict the U.S. - USSR.

• You talk in your book Building Nations from the idea of exporting institutions, in the sense that America should not export goods and aid money, but democratic institutions. Do not you think that this idea against the serial natural to create institutions, any society is the need to create institutions through the dynamics, not to issue him?

Francis Fukuyama: first, can not you be institutions unless there is support from within the community, The establishment of institutions means the solution The problems that are known to society, and move towards institutional governance is also good, but I do not see the harm in models inspired by foreign institutional, it is not in what it suggests to colonize new.

• So what do you mean the export of institutions?

Francis Fukuyama: What is meant Is to support the major international institutions like the World Bank for developing societies, and pressure in the direction of institutionalization, and ownership of institutions more effective, transparent and democratic, so I do not think that the process of exporting establishments are simple and easy.

• Reviewer: communities need to the natural course of the creation of institutions, the idea of Tsidiralamassat then she signed a colonial, and the fact that rash us double of what is the holder of the emblem of America - U.S. intervention - the U.S. invasion, American tutelage ... even U.S. support. We are in the communities tertiary need to be Nkt our course and go into battle alone with her ​​and what it ... why should instead think about us?

Francis Fukuyama: It is true what you are saying is true, it is among the greatest tragedies in the last decade, the exploitation of the Bush administration to the idea of development Democracy and support or be an excuse For the invasion of Iraq, and to intervene in the internal affairs of other countries, which strips the concept of help from Almsaddaqh It also distorted the image of America.

• So I think you took the initiative and other experts such as: Larry Diamond. & Michael AFaul Mc, to write and sign the report of the New Day New Way, US foreign assistance for the "" 21 h centry report notes the tone of the conscience awake and recognition errors and sectors of the U.S. foreign policy within the confines of the system World unipolar, as noted your quest to rebuild the image of America's moral - through this report - saying that the American character and also It can be a good partner after the master arrogant, but what did I observe in this report is whether America will remain in the quest to build a new image - the policy of double meaning calibrator with the right support autocracy, democracy left hand?.

Francis Fukuyama: It is true that America supports democracy and is interested in them as the basis of the foundations of its foreign policy, but America in the same now not give herself the guardian of democracy across the world as a target Oouhd and the highest for U.S. foreign policy, Vmsaleh significant weight in the process. The U.S. interests conflicting and diverse as the difference regions of the world, there are obsessed with security, the war on terrorism, support for autocracy, to ensure permanent access to oil resources .. All of these interests, which are written in terms of U.S. foreign policy, so if we spot what we support democracy, we are now in the same Support the autocratic regimes in Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Morocco .. etc. These cases show that democracy is not an initial priority along the line, although we support the programs of development and democracy in the Arab world but it is not a priority in this region. And practical question to be asked is how to change or least reduce the policy of double standards. the truth, I do not think the existence of the government would abandon this policy in its dealings with American interests, not one will say, "Come to the said Allen System in Morocco or Egypt for democracy "No one would do that, they're our allies if they were autocrats, and they have an important role in curbing the Islamic threat and the war on terrorism.
So, I think, and even reduce the American policy of double standards, by not giving priority to more awareness of the balance on the balance of democratic despotism, while seeking to protect their interests, and therefore it should put pressure on autocratic regimes Ally, even expand the area of freedoms, rights and freedom of the Democrats of human rights defenders.

• Reviewer: Sorry, your systems while receiving the allied forces of democracy in the prisons, or narrowing them down, America closed her eyes, does not care about it, any support for the Democrats and human rights is this?.

Francis Fukuyama: Exactly, so I think it is our duty as agents active in the American pressure on our governments to take practical steps more to support human rights and the protection of defenders in areas where the ruling autocratic and ally of America in the same now, in Musrmthela, the American pressure Oktheraly Mubarak paid his regime in the direction of democratic decision-making serve more, and to provide guarantees of non-exposure of the opposition Democrats. The truth is that America does not fear the Democrats as much as fear the Islamic forces in the Middle East.

• Outstanding: So America supports the authoritarian rulers of the region, and give them the green light to do what you like, only the green danger Stay away from us.

Francis Fukuyama: This is true of the errors committed by the U.S. administration that used the authoritarian rulers in the Arab region to reduce The risk of Islamists, but they took advantage of it to suppress the Democrats.

• Are we to recognize the problem discussed in the next book The origins of political order?

Francis Fukuyama: written next consider the question of the roots of the state and the foundations of this entity, and the role of law, it also covers some geographic areas and fields of different political to preview the experience of the state with all of China, India, the Islamic Caliphate and the Sultanate's experience in Egypt, then the history of evolution of political and institutional in the Middle East, as well to study some cases in the European context The same.

• After it changed your attitude, and after the wars fought by America in charge, and is still like that Ddalarhab fought, how to read the future date? The end is still in the direction that I talked about? Or is it the end of American global dominance in the direction of a multipolar world?.

Francis Fukuyama) laughing (: The argument of the "end of history" related to the idea of Western democracy as a model Well, I still think their health, in addition to my belief that the end of control America has been solved already, especially after the recent financial crisis. We are now compete with other countries such as China and Russia, America and even Brazil, America is not alone in influencing the decisions of the international arena. Moreover, the control of one state The world is neither healthy nor normal, today we are heading towards a multipolar world which is more natural.

---------------
Interview conducted at Stanford, California, Universiti light in November 2010

Yoshihiro Francis Fukuyama, author and thinker, an American national of Japanese descent, was born in Chicago in 1952. Is one of the most important thinkers of the neo-conservatives. Of his books: The End of History and the Last Man and the great collapse or fracture) and confidence (.

Iaterfokuyama one of the philosophers and thinkers contemporary Americans, as well as being a professor of International Political Economy and Director of the International Development Program at the University of Johns Hopkins, is currently the status of research on democracy, development and the rule of law at Stanford University - California.

Fukuyama graduated from the Department of Classical Studies at Cornell University, where he studied political philosophy at the hands of Allen Bloom Allen Bloom, while he received his Ph.D. from Harvard University, where he majored in political science.

And university teaching as well as the work of many functions: the work of a consultant in the U.S. State Department.

In 1989 the readers of the journal National Interest National Interest to date with the article "Nhihaltarich" which created a jolt of thought, where he said: The end of the history of oppression and totalitarian regimes is over forever with the end of the Cold War and the demolition of the Berlin Wall, to be replaced and liberal values ​​of Western democracy. He has explained his theory of Fukuyama's controversial book published in 1992 entitled "The End of History and the Last Man." Fukuyama was intended to oppose the idea of the end of history in the theory of Karl Marx's famous "historical materialism", which he considered that the end of persecution of human history will end when the differences between the layers disappear. Fukuyama was also influenced by the views of his theory in building the famous philosopher Hegel, philosopher and teacher, Allan Bloom, both of which connect between the end of persecution of human history and the stability of the free market system in Western democracies.

For a long time, before changing his positions, he considered Francis Fukuyama, one of the ideologues of the neo-conservatives, where he founded and a group of these in 1993, a research center known at the time the draft American Century, has called for he and his former U.S. President Bill Clinton need to get rid of the regime of former Iraqi President Saddam Hussein.

Economy and social movement

 Researchers, economics and social movement

• Pierre Bourdieu
• Of his book: Contrary to the fire (fire extinguisher) [text to contribute to the anti-neoliberal tide]

Pierre Bourdieu

It was a movement in December 1995 social movement of unprecedented scope and by their own goals. If she was considered very important by a significant portion of the population, French and static world in particular, because it also adopted a completely new targets in the field of social conflicts. Confused and ambiguous, and on the chart style (GDP) came to the draft community a real certified by the collective and is capable of confronting the social project imposed by the policy, the dominant and by the revolutionary conservatives who are currently in power, and within the political institutions and institutions of the production of speech . and Ptsaala about what researchers can be Bivoh Initiative similar cases in the public satisfied that their attendance after the discoverer of the cultural and ideological revolution pure for this province. If the movement in December the movement will be approved by an overwhelming majority is very large; it is because it seemed to be a defense for the gains of social not a particular social group, even if a particular social group is a match of this movement because they felt, in particular more than others, but to the entire community, even for a number of communities: These relate to the gains to employment, education and public transport, and what is public, and there are related to the state; this institution that are not necessarily the opposite of what we believe to be primitive and reactionary. If this movement had emerged in France, this is not a coincidence; there are historical reasons, but that may antagonize the observers is that they continue rotating format; France in different formats and unexpected movement of the drivers, it was expected they occur in this way? .. And also in Europe; Spain now; Greece a few years ago; in Germany, where the movement of the movement inspired by the French, declared explicitly for the relevance; Korea, which is also very important for symbolic reasons and practical. This kind of conflict is a shift in what seems to me in the search for the unity of theoretical and practical private, and can be considered the vanguard of the French movement a global struggle against neoliberalism and against the new conservative revolution that dimension takes the symbolic importance of including very large. But I think that one weakness of the progressive movements is that they underestimated this dimension, Tnges not always appropriate to the weapons of resistance and Massarath. The social movements to lag behind many of the revolutions is compared with opponents who rely on consultants and advisers in connection television .. Etc.. Declares the revolution to maintain it for the neo-liberal , Amadfah the same aura of scientific and ability to work as a theory, and one of the errors of theoretical and practical for many of the theories from the theory of Marxism was to forget to take into account the effectiveness of the theory, not a right we should make that mistake. We in the face of foes armed with theories; and it comes in what seems to me Bmgarathm weapons of intellectual, cultural, and the exercise of this conflict, and by the division of labor, some people are armed better than the others; and because of that profession, and a certain number of them willing to engage in work, What advice can contribute? .. First, a certain authority. What is called people who supported the Government of December? .. We have named experts, whereas those were not for them all the very beginning of the quarter as economic. Must face the impact of power this impact other authority to authority, but that's not all; strength of the power of scientific practice on the social movement, and even the depths of the conscience of the workers the power of very large; they spoke a form of discouragement, and one of the reasons for its strength is that it is exercised by the people who looked to be on good terms with each other Compatibility is generally a sign of truth, but it is also based on and relies on tools that owned the day this thought, which seems prima facie to be Aloaty force, ie, on mathematics in particular. The role of what we call the ideology of the dominant is the role exists today through the use of certain of mathematics (and those exaggerated by excessive, but a way to raise attention to the question that the act of rationalism any question of providing reasons to justify the things that do not accept the justification often found today in economics mathematical tool very strong .) It is important to oppose this ideology that wear the robe of a pure conservative ideology pure reason and the reasons and arguments and evidence Tfnivat; the exercise of any scientific work. One of the strengths of the neo-liberal thought is the same as imposing a form of "the great chain of existence," as was the case in the old theological metaphors that we find God in one end, then go after that until we reach the more modest the facts through a series of episodes. In the mist of neo-liberalism and the place of God in the highest high courts there is a gym, and on the bottom there is an ideological thought-do not know much about economics, but it can fool the people that know him a little thanks to some technical Alqamosa polishing. For this series the very strong effect of an authoritarian. There are doubts even among activists who produce all of the power, social power basis, and on the theory that give power to the words of Mr. Trichet or Mr. President Tietmeyer Albondespank, or this or that book of essays. This is not a series of proofs, but rather a series of authorities going from sports to banking, and banking to the philosopher, journalist, essayist, and to the journalist. It is also a channel moves the money and all kinds of economic and social privileges, invitations and global account and veneration. We can Alsosiologian, and without the exercise of defamation, that we dismantle these networks and explain how the circulation of ideas is backed by the rotation of power; there are people who commute services against the ideological positions of authority. Have to offer examples, but enough to read with interest the list of signatories of the "broad experts" notorious. What is important is that already in the hidden links between people who usually work independently, even if we see them often appear in two by two false debates on television, and between institutions, associations, magazines, etc. .. by shaving the veil which in the clear day. These people collectively use, and compatibility on the basis of Fashion, a letter is to convert Qdria Alenzuat as economic, but social laws, economic laws, etc. .., do not operate only on the level that let it affect him. If the Conservatives by the laissez-faire, it is because of these laws to maintain impartiality, the need to let him work in order to maintain. The laws of financial markets in particular, those that Ihdthonna them down, are the laws of the province need to let him work to be completed. Have to crystallize and Nhaj minutes and express our thoughts, and seek an excuse for Altbsaitia side when I came to say. As for what the social movement, it can only exist; so it creates enough of a hassle, and will not increase the demand that it provide justification. As for the intellectuals who join the social movement, we ask them immediately: "But what you propose? .. "We do not need to fall into the trap of the program, there are enough parties and hardware for that, and what we can do is to create not a program counter, but the body and the arrangement of the research group in between systems and the world will bring together researchers and activists and representatives of the fighters .. Etc., as well as researchers in view of their role specified: they can participate effectively in teams, in particular the work and thinking, and because of that profession, in partnership with members of those inside the movement. And that excludes at once a certain number of roles: Researchers are not the guys the way; any prisoners and the Trustee and immediate ceramic Chinese and excuses those who signed petitions and those who get rid of them as soon as we finish using them; they are not also Jaddanovyin come to practice within the social movements authorities-looking intellectual, which does not can be exercised within the intellectual life; they are not even two anti-expert experts, not the prophets also will answer all the questions about the social movement and about the future. They are the people who can help determine the function of bodies such as these, or the reminder that people who are here are not present here as speaking on behalf of the parties they represent, but as citizens came to a space for discussion and research they have ideas and arguments, leaving the depot clothing languages ​​wood, flat roofs and customs of the device , and it is not easy not easy, always. Among the habits of the danger which threatens us back from the new composition of the committees and there are suggestions of prepared formulations often .. etc.. The sociology learned how to operate the teams and how to take advantage of laws that operate and accordingly the difference to try to repeal these laws. Must invent new forms of communication between researchers and activists, a new division to work with each other. One of the tasks that researchers can accomplish better than any other person may lie in the resistance of the hammer media; we hear all day long sentences carefully crafted and perfectly, so we could not open the radio without hearing talk of "global village" and " globalization ".. etc., It does not form her words, but words pass through the philosophy and the look of the entire world of fatalism and secrete Turkaa. We can oppose this hammer the media through the criticism of words and by helping non-professionals to acquire the private armies of the resistance, in order to resist the impact of authoritarianism on the power of television, which plays absolutely central role; we can not go into today's social conflicts without having a software conflict, the quality of with and against the television, and was referred to the book, Patrick Champagne "opinion making", which must be some sort of book Gladiator political Manual ^(1). The battle in this struggle against the intellectuals, the media battle is important. For my part, these people do not go to sleep from my eyes and not think about them at all when I write, but their point of view the political role of the utmost importance, and hoped to accept the slice of the researchers cut off part of her time and energy and devoted to research in the way of struggle to ensure anti-influence . another goal; and is in the creation of new formulas for the symbolic act; and I think on this point that the social movements, with some historical exceptions, are movements of late. The Patrick Champagne presents in his book how some of the major forms of packaging that does not command the pages of newspapers and on television but from places to places less small-scale demonstrations, but organized it of interest to journalists. And not a matter of course in turn Bmassarah journalists who suffer under the pressure of the constraints of fragility, with all the effects of control produced by this vulnerability at the level of all professions of cultural production. But it is essential to know that much of what we can say or do will be screened, which often negate it through what he has to say about journalists, including what we do here, and this Note will not be re-produced in their reports ... and to end by saying that one of the problems is the to be meditative and this heavy word, but did not use the free of charge; we've got a goal not only devise a new formula for the organization of the protest action and conflict, organization, and new versions of the act of struggle. What can we dream of researchers is the possibility to be part of our research useful to social movement rather than lost as is often the case today, because it is catcher and distorted by journalists or anti Múlan .. etc.. We hope in the context of teams like the band "emitters move Raisons d'agir "create new forms of expression enables the delivery of the most advanced research achievements of the activists, but this is assumed by the researchers to change the language of the event and thought. And until we return to the movement of social I think as I said it just that we are movements rotating to the conflict I ​​could also mention strikes by students and professors, Belgium, and strikes in Italy .. etc. against the imperialism of neo-liberalism; conflicts did not know each other more often (which can take formulas are not always peaceful, such as some forms of fundamentalism). Permission must be at least unify the global media and work on the publication and delivery. Must re-invent the internationalism that the trend has been captured and diverted by Soviet imperialism; any theoretical innovation modes of thinking and modes of practical action capable of positioning at the level that can occur when the battle. If it is true that most of the economic forces dominant move at the global level and across nations, it is also true that there is a place empty, a place of conflicts, transnational, place an empty theory because it is a thinker in it, and it is not busy practice, the lack of organization of a truly global power capable of counter-revolutionary conservative new on the European level at least.